
Smith & Nephew, a UK-based medical device manufacturer with U.S. headquarters in Memphis, TN, has recently come under fire for its Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System, which was introduced to the market back in 2006. Hip resurfacing is an alternative surgical solution to total hip replacement; instead of replacing the entire worn-down femur with a prosthetic one, a metal cap is placed over the existing bone along with a matching metal socket, which is inserted in the acetabulum, or pelvic socket. This way, only a few centimeters of the original bone is removed, allowing patients to retain more of their bone structure. Hip resurfacing can also reduce the risk of hip dislocation and facilitate future replacement or revision surgery if either turns out to be necessary.

Smith & Nephew has also run into trouble with its total hip replacement devices. In June 2012, the company recalled the optional metal liner component of its R3 Acetabular System due to high rates of failure. The R3 metal liner, which is inserted into the device’s metal pelvic socket, was originally designed for use with the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the R3 Acetabular System was never cleared for use with the R3 metal liner. Plaintiffs in Smith & Nephew hip replacement lawsuits claim that the combination of these devices caused fracturing, dislocation of the implant, and infection of the tissue around the hip joint.
Check with your doctor of physician whenever you seek to change treatment plans. If you or someone close to you suffered from a failed Smith & Nephew hip resurfacing or replacement implant, contact the lawyers at Lopez McHugh immediately to receive a free consultation. You may be eligible to receive compensation through a Smith & Nephew resurfacing or replacement lawsuit.
